 |
Sign at Dollymount Beach, Dublin |
Twitter has been talking a lot about women this week - you may have heard of the
#Twittersilence hashtag to take on trolls. One of the parallel hastags is
#inspiringwomen
I see both points of view. Someone is behaving like Stone Age Man so you leave the dialogue and that takes away the fuel from his madness. It can work - if SAM has no-one to shout at, he will probably move onto a more visible target.
The other option of yelling pride from the roof-tops can also be effective - you show SAM nothing he says has any grounding in reality. And hope he gives up under the avalanche and goes away.
Unfortunately a lot of the discussion between women has drifted from SAM and onto competing between ourselves as to which approach is better. *sighs*
Like when a trainer says don't get in that ring because you will contaminate it and make 'my boys' lose their next fight. Is there any response other than walking away and finding a gym with more tolerant attitudes - so you can train and fight and win?
(an example from my youth BTW but still found in unexpressed form today)
But on other occasions loud noise is appropriate - like when officials try to change the length of a women's fight because they say we can't last the full five rounds. Regulation and legislation SAMs need to be fought - loudly and often.
I was a bit saddened though to notice how few sportswomen got tagged as #inspiringwomen. That would be my gripe with feminism I guess - science, arts, politics are all moving centre-stage for the movement but sports are still seen as something it's OK to leave to men by many women.
Not on this blog though - we celebrate Inspiring Sports Women all the time here. Any thoughts on which approach you prefer - silence or inspiration?